in order to get rid of their subconscious guilt, blamed the temptation of women and said, "It's the woman You gave me company. Give me something to eat.” The scumbag defended and rewrote the story, leaving two thousand years of misogyny for mankind. If it were given to Jung, how would he interpret it? According to my conjecture of Jung, Jung will interpret the dispute between Adam and Eve as the beginning of the integration of the female side of the male, or the male side of the female (anima and Animus): men blame women It's a disaster, women accuse men of being irresponsible...
The war between the sexes for thousands of years! Or, Jung, who has always paid attention to eastern culture, will find that "Genesis" is very similar to the ancient Chinese mythology: Nuwa, the goddess of creation, shaped human beings according sms services to her appearance. If he goes on research, he may find that the first place in the creation of human beings by Nuwa was later given to Huangdi (as well as Fuxi or Pangu), and the human beings created by Huangdi were divided into males and females. Could this transition from matrilineal to patriarchal society also represent a heroic journey? As Jung discovered, in order to get rid of the charm of the subconscious,
One has to psychologically slaughter the Great Mother Goddess (which happens to be the ancient goddess of the snake body), often symbolized by dragons. There are unique legends all over the Chinese history. In the past, we seldom used psychological methods to interpret these stories systematically. Maybe the part of the creation myth will have to wait, but if you want to listen to the Liao Zhai story "Lotus Fragrance" or the Taiwanese legend "Aunt Tiger", Dr. Deng Huiwen and Ms. Zhong Ying from "The Book of Wisdom" are all ready to use Rong From